Good breakdown in the article of the various layers of inexcusable idiocy in these comments. for instance:
1. Confusing weather and climate.
2. STILL smearing “climate change” as the scientific explanation of the available data.
3. He somehow forgets that yeah, we’d pay a lot for climate change, but we caused a LOT of the mess, and we also benefit from addressing it. He makes it sound like he managed to squeeze his way out of giving charity for a dubious cause.
